![]() ![]() If you put a man and woman (of similar height) into actual, full plate armor and stood them side-by-side IRL, completely silent, there's no way in hell you'd know which was which. Point is, I think it is important to acknowledge there is good boob armor.īut armor does obfuscate gender, generally. However, they are also considered somewhat logically.where they are fully curved outwards, to channel a glanced blade off to the side. ![]() With room in the front for potentially large breasts. The last two armors were clearly design with a woman in mind. I agree this type of armor is a little silly. Where the contours channel the blade into the center of the sternum. ![]() The second is what I believe you are referring to. I feel if magic is involved, that's not necessary. This is often supported as "historically accurate" (very loosely) which some people go for. My first assumption is that it is a woman, but it could easily be a guy as well. The first almost completely obfuscates the person's gender. I feel like even this needs to be clarified, because it may be misinterpreted as "any plate armor that reveals sex is bad". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |